1027 DEVELOPING A MINIMUM COMMON DATASET FOR HIP FRACTURE AUDIT

Abstract Introduction National hip fracture audits share a common heritage in the work of Rikshöft and Standardised Audit Hip Fracture Europe. However, as more countries develop audit programmes these evolve to address local needs, divergence data they collect compromises their scope for learning from clinical, quality improvement other nations. Method In 2021 we compared all ten established national audits: England/Wales/Northern Ireland; Scotland; Australia/New Zealand; Germany; Netherlands; Sweden; Norway; Denmark; Spain. We tabulated questions included each, cross-referenced them against 32 minimum dataset (MCD) defined by global Fragility Network (FFN) 2014. identified those consistently used most audits, additional fields that might need form part revised MCD. Any MCD must meet needs both developed developing countries. presented findings at Asia-Pacific FFN meeting, an online questionnaire capture feedback different A draft revision was Global conference September 2021, with again finalise this Results total 215 possible questions. Only 72 (34%) were >1 audit, only (15%) than half audits. Adherence 2014 disappointing; least one but 5/32 audit. 21/32 (65%) majority, three (anaesthetic grade, operation date/time surgery) Discussion This will help aspirant nations establish new programmes, facilitate integration novel analytic techniques greater multinational collaboration, serve internationally-accepted standard monitoring improving services.